No. 06-15907.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Submitted August 27, 2007.[*]
Filed August 31, 2007.
Larrie Thomas, Las Vegas, NV, pro se.
Andrea R. Tebbets, Esq., Carol A. Barthel, U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division/Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Kent J.
Page 512
Dawson, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-06-00004-KJD.
Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM[**]
Larrie Thomas appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his action against the United States and various individuals in which he alleged that the government’s levy actions were improper. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. After de novo review, Sommatino v. United States, 255 F.3d 704, 707 (9th Cir. 2001), we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Thomas’ action because he failed to identify any applicable waiver of sovereign immunity that would allow his action to proceed in district court See Elias v. Connett, 908 F.2d 521, 527 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Absent its consent to suit, an action against the United States must be dismissed.”); Gilbert v. DaGrossa, 756 F.2d 1455, 1458 (9th Cir. 1985) (claims against government employees in their official capacities barred by sovereign immunity).
We do not consider the district court’s denial of Thomas’ post-judgment motion for reconsideration because Thomas did not separately appeal that order. See Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 401-02, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995).
Thomas’ remaining contentions lack merit.
Because the arguments raised in Thomas’ appeal are frivolous, we grant the government’s motion for sanctions, and we award sanctions in the amount of $4,000. See Fed.R.App.P. 38; Grimes v. Comm’r, 806 F.2d 1451, 1454 (9th Cir. 1986) (per curiam). We deny all other pending motions.
AFFIRMED.