UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guillermo MENDEZ-MENDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-30252.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Submitted September 24, 2007.[*]
Filed October 1, 2007.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
[*] This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Alan G. Burrow, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Greg S. Silvey, Esq., Kuna, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho, Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-04-00094-05-EJL.

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Court Judges.

MEMORANDUM[**]
Guillermo Mendez-Mendez appeals from the 140-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and

Page 648

846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Appellant contends that the district court improperly considered the Sentencing Guidelines range to be the presumptive sentence. This contention is belied by the record.

Appellant also contends that the district court failed to adequately consider the nature of his criminal history under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). We conclude that the district court properly considered his criminal history and the § 3553(a) factors. See United States v. Knows His Gun, 438 F.3d 913, 918-19 (9th Cir. 2006), cert denied ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 2913, 165 L.Ed.2d 931 (2006).

AFFIRMED.

[**] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.